Question asked on Jun 16th, 2014
Q: We were only engaged for 4 months. Did not get engaged on a holiday It was not a gift it was a commitment.
A: Your explanation is a bit vague, and Nevada does not have a published Opinion from the Nevada Supreme Court explicitly on point. However, I have researched this pretty closely (and litigated it a couple of times) and Nevada almost certainly will follow the “general rule” — an engagement ring is a conditional gift, not effective until the condition (actual marriage ceremony) is completed. Until then, it belongs to the giver; after that, it belongs to the recipient.
If you need further assistance, you should consult an attorney.
Marshal S. Willick is the principal of the Willick Law Group, an A/V rated Family Law firm in Las Vegas, Nevada, and practices in trial and appellate Family Law. He is a Certified Family Law Specialist, a Fellow of both the American and International Academies of Matrimonial Lawyers, former Chair of the Nevada Bar Family Law Section and former President of the Nevada chapter of the AAML.
Latest posts by Marshal S. Willick (see all)
- Five SCT Published: In the Matter of the Parental Rights as to R.A.S., In the Matter of H.B., III., CCSD v. Dist. Court (Sharp), In the Matter of Children N.D., G.D., and M.D., and Gill - April 12, 2026
- New Cases Added to MLAW: Five SCT Published: Martinez, In Re: Matter of N.R.R. and N.I.R., Walker, Nester, and In Re: Matter of A.T. - April 4, 2026
- New Cases Added to MLAW: Five SCT Published: Destin, In the Matter of the Parental Rights as to S.A.T., Oshiro, CCSD v. Dist. Court (Angalia B.)(AO 11); andCCSD v. Dist. Court (Angalia B.) (AO 48) - March 28, 2026